Here is why Spacex faces a brilliant future as government contractor despite Musk-Trump’s divorce

The public break between Elon Musk and President Trump has launched a future about Spacex’s future, but the tycoon’s company should remain in a solid trajectory because the two parties need.

Trump has had his Private Buddy’s private signature to fulfill the NASA administration plans to return to the Moon, ongoing operations at the International Space Station, an agreement classified with Intelligence US to build hundreds of spy satellites and extend the Internet access to the rural parts of America.

Spacex, known for building and launching rockets and the Starlink Satellite Internet Internet network, has about $ 22 billion in government contracts in books, according to Reuters.

Includes an agreement of about $ 5 billion to build the Dragon spacecraft to use NASA, which Musk threatened to turn off in its unpleasant social media problems directed to Trump, only to reverse the hours later.

Trump threatened to end Musk federal contracts in response to the verbal attack, which included the allegation that Trump is “in Epstein’s files” and would have “lost the election” without his help.

“Trump could certainly cancel the majority of offers and contracts if he wants, but the government may still have to pay them; it depends on the contract data,” the post a republican consultant connected to Trump, who was anonymous to talk about the candidate about the feud.

The two men did not look closer to a detainee, with Trump who refused to get on the phone with his former Dooge’s cost cutter and his largest benefactor of the campaign after the “Great Bill” of the White House exploited.

Although this makes it a great theater, the division probably works in both favors, according to the source.

“Trump and Elon achieved what they wanted here,” said GOP consultant.

“Elon was able to distance Trump in a public enough way to return to his business on the court, and Trump could have all the Maga warriors who questioned the bill or even defending it so that they could defend Trump and show that they set their side.”

Spacex “will be fine” despite the fireworks, added the source.

White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, refused to comment on the Word War.

“President Trump is focused on doing our country again and passing the great bill,” he said.

Spacex did not immediately return a comment request.

As the founder, president and CEO of Spacex, Musk has total control with 79% of the company’s voting shares from 2023, according to a presentation at that time. The narrow firm had a $ 350 million assessment.

Generally, Musk and his business that also include Tesla, the firm of neural brain chips and the boring company have received at least $ 38 million in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, according to a recent Washington Post analysis.

If Trump decides to go to Defcon 5 to Musk, the alleged drug use of the billionaire could be used as a possible lever to drag Spacex contracts.

During Trump’s first term in office in 2019, Bloomberg reported that the Pentagon reviewed Musk’s Spacex Authorization after smoking marijuana during an appearance at the “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast.

Although Musk has intensified drugs that did not use drugs, the chamber this week requested Trump’s details on whether he was aware of Musk who worked “under the influence.”

The possible loss of government contracts would not be “catastrophic” for Musk or his rocket company.

“Spacex has developed in a global power station that dominates most of the space industry, but there is no doubt that it would mean lost income and lost contract opportunities,” he told Reuters Justus Parmar, CEO of Spacex Investor Fortuna Investments.

Meanwhile, Steve Bannon, Maga Firebrand, requested that the South African musc be deported, and floated the possibility that Trump could use a Korean War Statute called Defense Production Law to allow a federal prey of the private property company.

However, the proposal for holding the owner is likely to be a non-arter.

“There is no way that Bannon’s idea of ​​taking care of private companies works in the long term, both because it would be litigated and other companies would keep the United States government on arm duration to avoid future problems,” said the consultant. “Nor can the results be done.”